Deconstructing First Principles of Payments: How Can Stablecoins Unlock a Trillion-Dollar Opportunity?
Original Article Title: A First Principles Breakdown of the Crypto Payments Stack
Original Article Author: @proofofnathan
Original Article Translation: zhouzhou, BlockBeats
Editor's Note: This article explores the huge potential of stablecoins in the payment space, suggesting that stablecoins will surpass traditional payment systems due to being more efficient, faster, and cheaper. The article introduces the various layers of the crypto payments stack, from consumer wallets and payment providers to the financial integration layer, such as Banking as a Service and over-the-counter trading platforms. The application of stablecoins has not only boosted financial firms' profits but also improved user experience, driving the adoption of crypto payments. Ultimately, the core role of stablecoins in crypto payments will drive nearly all blockchains towards the payments space.
The following is the original content (slightly rephrased for better readability):
It's not just because stablecoins' supply has exceeded $230 billion, or that Circle has filed for an IPO, or that I often say, "It's already here."
It's because stablecoins are fundamentally disrupting the payments industry, and this disruption will continue at an exponential pace.
My core thesis is simple: Stablecoins will replace traditional payment methods because they are better, faster, and cheaper.

However, "payment" is a broad concept. Today's payment system is still dominated by traditional payment networks, banks, and fintech companies, each playing different roles in the payment structure of Web2.
While stablecoins offer a more efficient, highly available alternative, today's payment stack is gradually replicating the complexity of Web2 systems—this is why it is necessary for us to break it down.
Currently, hundreds of companies are building stablecoin-based payment networks or establishing complementary infrastructure alongside them.
@Dberenzon put together a fantastic chart that breaks down the on-chain payment ecosystem into nine different subdomains, and below is that chart.

What Dmitriy provides is a deep and somewhat technical breakdown, while entities like Pantera in "The Trillion-Dollar Opportunity" take a more macro view, dividing the entire payment system into four layers.

In this article, I attempt to reframe the payment stack in a crypto-native, first principles-based manner. Of course, the classification methods proposed by individuals such as Dmitriy and Pantera remain highly valuable, providing a good framework from another perspective.
For a better understanding, I see the structure of the entire payment stack as a vertical path—where the top is one type of user and the bottom is another type of user. And I believe the ultimate achievement of the payment stack is to allow billions of users to seamlessly access the crypto system, even unknowingly.
Crypto Payments Stack
Starting from first principles, a stablecoin is a token on the blockchain that represents a fiat currency unit, with the most common being pegged to the US Dollar.
There are several types of stablecoins, including:
· Fiat-backed, such as USDT
· Crypto-backed, such as DAI
· Synthetic, such as USDe
The most dominant type is fiat-backed stablecoins. These stablecoins are backed by highly liquid assets such as US Treasuries, cash, and equivalents, held in reserves by custodians at a 1:1 ratio. Therefore, at the bottom layer of the payment stack, traditional banks and payment systems still exist.
As mentioned earlier, stablecoins are disrupting the traditional payment system because they are better, faster, and cheaper. This has not only increased the profit margins of fintech and payment companies but has also provided end-users with a better experience. Therefore, from a user perspective, consumers are at the topmost layer of the payment stack.
In conclusion, the current payment stack can be roughly understood as follows:
(An illustrative diagram will be shown here)

Now, let's look at the most core use case in the payment stack. We have seen that one of the highest user retention use cases in the crypto industry is actually the "off-ramp"—converting cryptocurrency to fiat currency.
While the concept of an "on-ramp" (converting fiat into crypto) is also common, the predominant need has always been the ability to easily spend crypto assets, especially stablecoins.
In the payment stack we are building, on/off-ramp service providers sit right in the middle.

Above the on/off-ramp service providers is a section primarily focused on consumers or tools that support consumer usage, which I refer to as the **"Consumer Serving Layers".
Below them — from on/off-ramp to traditional banks — lies the part that integrates stablecoins into the traditional financial system, which I call the "Financial Integration Layers".
It is worth noting that the number of layers in the Consumer Serving Layers is much greater than in the Financial Integration Layers.
The reason is simple: building a Financial Integration Layer often requires licensing, compliance processes, and highly structured operations. Consumer Serving Layers can directly leverage the services and contractual relationships established in the lower layers to rapidly build on top of them.
Of course, there may be other modules in the Consumer Serving Layers, but here I have only selected the key parts in the entire payment stack that have clear functionality, well-defined dependencies, and a crucial role to explain.
Consumer Serving Layers

From the consumer's perspective, the first step into the crypto payment stack is a wallet.
A wallet is not just a tool for storing crypto assets; it is actually the gateway to the entire "save, spend, earn" experience.
Modern wallets usually have various functions, such as debit card payments, virtual bank accounts, peer-to-peer transfers, etc., designed to meet users' diverse scenario needs.
There are already a wide range of wallet products on the market, some targeting global users and others focusing on specific regional markets.
Building a wallet is actually very complex
It involves integrating multiple services and requires high-level security measures to prevent hacking attacks.
Therefore, many teams choose to rely on Wallet-as-a-Service (WaaS) providers. These WaaS solutions have been audited, battle-tested, and usually integrate infrastructure such as on/off-ramp services, issuer interfaces, and more.
In order to get consumer wallets truly "running," they also need to rely on various B2B stablecoin payment service providers, with key modules including:
· Invoice services: allow users to invoice their employer in crypto or fiat, with the platform receiving the payment, converting on demand, and then depositing into the user's wallet.
· Payment streaming: as companies globalize and employees are distributed worldwide, these platforms support regular stablecoin payroll, especially useful in countries where local bank access is not available.
· Card issuers: as user spending shifts from cash to electronic payments, encrypted cards become increasingly important. These issuing entities usually partner with Visa, Mastercard, enabling wallets to have the ability to "swipe card" for real-world transactions.
Compliance is also crucial, and to safeguard user funds, most platforms integrate comprehensive compliance tools at the wallet layer, including:
· KYC/AML (Know Your Customer/Anti-Money Laundering)
· On-chain fraud detection services
These compliance service providers play a significant role in the consumer service layer, both ensuring platform compliance and enhancing user trust.
Additionally, peer-to-peer payment networks are also part of the consumer layer. These networks bypass traditional payment pathways, directly connecting users and merchants for encrypted and fiat transaction exchanges.
P2P payments are widely adopted in some developing countries, but compared to the overall payment stack, they are less efficient with smaller transaction volumes, serving more as a complementary solution to traditional channels. Finally, the on/off-ramp aggregators sit at the bottom of the consumer service layer.
They consolidate multiple on/off-ramp services into a single unified API, allowing wallet developers to automatically choose solutions with faster speeds, lower fees, and better regional coverage, enhancing user experience.
Financial Integration Layers

Transitioning to Financial Integration Layers brings us to the "backbone" of the entire crypto payment stack.
In the traditional payment stack, the part we are about to discuss is usually referred to as the Aggregation & Orchestration Layer. However, I believe that the reason it can "aggregate" and "orchestrate" is because it sits on top of a robust and intricate infrastructure. Therefore, this layer should be placed at the very top of the financial integration layer.
Below the Aggregation & Orchestration Layer lies the core support for the entire fund flow, with the following three layers being key foundational modules that are frequently aggregated and orchestrated:
1. Banking-as-a-Service (BaaS) Providers
These platforms offer modular financial infrastructure that allows companies to integrate services such as virtual bank accounts, card issuance, payment channels, and more.
They typically assist clients in completing compliance, back-office settlement, and other processes, enabling businesses to provide quasi-banking services in their products without holding a financial license themselves.
2. Over-the-Counter (OTC) Trading Platforms
OTC platforms specialize in handling large-volume transactions, serving as a bridge for companies that cannot directly interface with major exchanges or liquidity providers.
They can swiftly and efficiently facilitate bi-directional exchanges between stablecoins and fiat currencies, greatly simplifying the settlement process for large trades.
3. Liquidity Providers
Working closely with OTC platforms, they ensure sufficient fund availability and timely settlement for transactions globally. These institutions shield the complexity of fund movement between crypto and fiat currencies, allowing various applications to execute coin swaps, payments, and other operations through simple API calls.
Many companies are unwilling to self-custody millions of dollars' worth of stablecoins or other crypto assets. Therefore, custody service providers have become an indispensable foundational component. They offer regulated, insured, institutional-grade secure custody solutions, serving as the trust anchor for almost all crypto payment applications.
In the payment stack, Centralized Exchanges (CEXs) play a critical role, especially in the financial integration stage. They facilitate large-scale fiat-to-stablecoin settlements through liquidity provider integrations and mint/redeem services. These exchanges typically hold a portion of stablecoins and cash reserves to ensure smooth fund transfers for both parties.
At the bottom layer are the Mint & Redeem services, which form the foundation of the entire payment stack. Stablecoins exist because someone "mints" them, and others "redeem" them.
· Tether (USDT) operates its minting and redemption mechanism based on whitelisted partners who directly receive user bank transfers and exchange them for an equivalent amount of USDT.
·Circle (USDC) provides minting and redemption services through Circle Mint for companies that have completed KYB (Know Your Business) verification.
Final Summary: A Comprehensive Payment Stack Overview
The payment stack is dynamic and highly interconnected. Each layer relies on the tools, services, and providers behind it. Overall, the cryptocurrency payment stack looks like this:

Stablecoin-driven payments represent one of the most influential and easily adoptable real-world use cases for cryptocurrencies beyond Bitcoin as a store of value. @PlasmaFDN is a blockchain designed specifically for stablecoin payments and is well-positioned in this area. However, I expect that almost all blockchains will eventually pivot towards stablecoins and the payments space.
To achieve this goal, they must rethink their payment stack—simply being EVM-compatible is no longer sufficient.

In summary, stablecoins indeed present a trillion-dollar opportunity, and those who play key roles in the payment stack will reap the greatest rewards.

Source: Original Article Link
You may also like

Trump, the World's Largest Oil Trader

If the US and Iran have not reached an agreement in 5 days, what other cards does Trump have?

Tether Whale Dumps £12 Million, Backing Crypto’s ‘British Trump’

Ethereum Foundation Post: Rethinking the Division of Work Between L1 and L2 to Build the Ultimate Ethereum Ecosystem

Two Major Prediction Market Platforms Unite Rarely, What Is the Story Behind This New Fund?

WEEX Official Product Launch: Win LALIGA Tickets & Unlock the 3-in-1 Crypto Trading Suite
Trade crypto without downloading an app. Join the WEEX H5, API, SKILLs livestream to explore the new trading experience, win LALIGA VIP tickets, and share 420 USDT rewards.

Dragonfly Partners: Most agents will not engage in autonomous trading, how can crypto payments prevail?

US AI Startup Goes All In on Chinese Mega-Model | Rewire News Morning Brief

Trump Lies Again: A "Five-Day Pause" Psyop, How Wall Street, Bitcoin, and Polymarket Insiders Synced Uposciogen

When a Token Becomes Labor, People Become the Interface

Ceasefire News Leaked Ahead of Time? Large Polymarket Bets on Outcome Before Trump's Tweet

BlackRock CEO's Annual Shareholder Letter: How is Wall Street Using AI to Keep Profiting from National Pension Funds?

Sun Valley Releases 2025 Financial Report: Bitcoin Mining Revenue Reaches $670 Million, Accelerating Transformation to AI Infrastructure Platform
On March 16, 2026, in Dallas, Texas, USA, CanGu Company (New York Stock Exchange code: CANG, hereinafter referred to as "CanGu" or the "Company") today announced its unaudited financial performance for the fourth quarter and full year ended December 31, 2025. As a btc-42">bitcoin mining enterprise relying on a globally operated layout and dedicated to building an integrated energy and AI computing power platform, CanGu is actively advancing its business transformation and infrastructure development.
• Financial Performance:
Total revenue for the full year 2025 was $688.1 million, with $179.5 million in the fourth quarter.
Bitcoin mining business revenue for the full year was $675.5 million, with $172.4 million in the fourth quarter.
Full-year adjusted EBITDA was $24.5 million, while the fourth quarter was -$156.3 million.
• Mining Operations and Costs:
A total of 6,594.6 bitcoins were mined throughout the year, averaging 18.07 bitcoins per day; of which 1,718.3 bitcoins were mined in the fourth quarter, averaging 18.68 bitcoins per day.
The average mining cost for the full year (excluding miner depreciation) was $79,707 per bitcoin, and for the fourth quarter, it was $84,552;
The all-in sustaining costs were $97,272 and $106,251 per bitcoin, respectively.
As of the end of December 2025, the company has cumulatively produced 7,528.4 bitcoins since entering the bitcoin mining business.
• Strategic Progress:
The company has completed the termination of the American Depositary Receipt (ADR) program and transitioned to a direct listing on the NYSE to enhance information transparency and align with its strategic direction, with a long-term goal of expanding its investor base.
CEO Paul Yu stated: "2025 marked the company's first full year as a bitcoin mining enterprise, characterized by rapid execution and structural reshaping. We completed a comprehensive adjustment of our asset system and established a globally distributed mining network. Additionally, the company introduced a new management team, further strengthening our capabilities and competitive advantage in the digital asset and energy infrastructure space. The completion of the NYSE direct listing and USD pricing also signifies our transformation into a global AI infrastructure company."
"As we enter 2026, the company will continue to optimize its balance sheet structure and enhance operational efficiency and cost resilience through adjustments to the miner portfolio. At the same time, we are advancing our strategic transformation into an AI infrastructure provider. Leveraging EcoHash, we will utilize our capabilities in scalable computing power and energy networks to provide cost-effective AI inference solutions. The relevant site transformations and product development are progressing simultaneously, and the company is well-positioned to sustain its execution in the new phase."
The company's Chief Financial Officer, Michael Zhang, stated: "By 2025, the company is expected to achieve significant revenue growth through its scaled mining operations. Despite recording a net loss of $452.8 million from ongoing operations, mainly due to one-time transformation costs and market-driven fair value adjustments, the company, from a financial perspective, will reduce its leverage, optimize its Bitcoin reserve strategy and liquidity management, introduce new capital to strengthen its financial position, and seize investment opportunities in high-potential areas such as AI infrastructure while navigating market volatility."
The total revenue for the fourth quarter was $1.795 billion. Of this, the Bitcoin mining business contributed $1.724 billion in revenue, generating 1,718.3 Bitcoins during the quarter. Revenue from the international automobile trading business was $4.8 million.
The total operating costs and expenses for the fourth quarter amounted to $4.56 billion, primarily attributed to expenses related to the Bitcoin mining business, as well as impairment of mining machines and fair value losses on Bitcoin collateral receivables.
This includes:
· Cost of Revenue (excluding depreciation): $1.553 billion
· Cost of Revenue (depreciation): $38.1 million
· Operating Expenses: $9.9 million (including related-party expenses of $1.1 million)
· Mining Machine Impairment Loss: $81.4 million
· Fair Value Loss on Bitcoin Collateral Receivables: $171.4 million
The operating loss for the fourth quarter was $276.6 million, a significant increase from a loss of $0.7 million in the same period of 2024, primarily due to the downward trend in Bitcoin prices.
The net loss from ongoing operations was $285 million, compared to a net profit of $2.4 million in the same period last year.
The adjusted EBITDA was -$156.3 million, compared to $2.4 million in the same period last year.
The total revenue for the full year was $6.881 billion. Of this, the revenue from the Bitcoin mining business was $6.755 billion, with a total output of 6,594.6 Bitcoins for the year. Revenue from the international automobile trading business was $9.8 million.
The total annual operating costs and expenses amount to $1.1 billion.
Specifically, they include:
· Revenue Cost (excluding depreciation): $543.3 million
· Revenue Cost (depreciation): $116.6 million
· Operating Expenses: $28.9 million (including related-party expenses of $1.1 million)
· Miner Impairment Loss: $338.3 million
· Bitcoin Collateral Receivable Fair Value Change Loss: $96.5 million
The full-year operating loss is $437.1 million. The continuing operations net loss is $452.8 million, while in 2024, there was a net profit of $4.8 million.
The 2025 non-GAAP adjusted net profit is $24.5 million (compared to $5.7 million in 2024). This measure does not include share-based compensation expenses; refer to "Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures" for details.
As of December 31, 2025, the company's key assets and liabilities are as follows:
· Cash and Cash Equivalents: $41.2 million
· Bitcoin Collateral Receivable (Non-current, related party): $663.0 million
· Miner Net Value: $248.7 million
· Long-Term Debt (related party): $557.6 million
In February 2026, the company sold 4,451 bitcoins and repaid a portion of related-party long-term debt to reduce financial leverage and optimize the asset-liability structure.
As per the stock repurchase plan disclosed on March 13, 2025, as of December 31, 2025, the company had repurchased a total of 890,155 shares of Class A common stock for approximately $1.2 million.

The US AI Startup Is Loving China's Open Source Model

Three Weeks of the US-Iran War: Who's Making Money, Who's Paying the Bill?

Interpreting Polymarket's Major Update Last Night: Fee Expansion, Self-Regulation, and New Incentives

From Human Application to Intelligent Collaboration: How GOAT Network Builds the Next Generation Digital Economy

CZ Washington Dialogue: Crypto Entrepreneurs are Accelerating Their Return to the United States
Trump, the World's Largest Oil Trader
If the US and Iran have not reached an agreement in 5 days, what other cards does Trump have?
Tether Whale Dumps £12 Million, Backing Crypto’s ‘British Trump’
Ethereum Foundation Post: Rethinking the Division of Work Between L1 and L2 to Build the Ultimate Ethereum Ecosystem
Two Major Prediction Market Platforms Unite Rarely, What Is the Story Behind This New Fund?
WEEX Official Product Launch: Win LALIGA Tickets & Unlock the 3-in-1 Crypto Trading Suite
Trade crypto without downloading an app. Join the WEEX H5, API, SKILLs livestream to explore the new trading experience, win LALIGA VIP tickets, and share 420 USDT rewards.
