How Will the 2026 Federal Reserve Affect the Crypto Space?
Original Article Title: 2026: The Year of the Fed's Regime Change
Original Article Author: @krugermacro
Translation: Peggy, BlockBeats
Editor's Note: In 2026, the Federal Reserve may experience a true "regime change." If Hassett becomes the chair, monetary policy may shift from the Powell era's cautious approach to a more aggressive rate-cutting path and a "growth-first" framework. Short-term rates, long-term expectations, and cross-asset pricing will all be forced to reassess. This article outlines the key logic and market impact of this potential turning point. Next year's trading theme is not just about rate cuts but about a whole new Fed.
Below is the original text:
The Federal Reserve as we know it will come to an end in 2026.
The most important driver of asset returns next year will be the "New Fed" – more specifically, the policy paradigm shift brought about by a newly appointed chair by Trump.
Kevin Hassett has become the most likely candidate for Fed chair that Trump is likely to nominate (as of December 2, the Kalshi prediction market gives a 70% probability). Hassett is the current Director of the National Economic Council, a supply-side economist, and a long-time loyal supporter of Trump. He advocates for the idea of "growth first," believing that since the war against inflation has largely been won, maintaining high real interest rates is no longer economically rational but a politically stubborn stance. If he takes office, this will signify a decisive regime change: the Fed will shift from Powell's era of technocratic caution to a policy framework more explicitly aimed at lowering borrowing costs and advancing the president's economic agenda.
To understand the policy regime he will establish, one can look directly at his public statements this year on rates and the Fed:
"If the Fed doesn't cut rates in December, the only explanation is anti-Trump partisan bias." (November 21)
"If I were on the FOMC, I would be more likely to vote for a rate cut, while Powell would be less likely." (November 12)
"I agree with Trump: rates can be significantly lowered." (November 12)
"The expected three rate cuts are just the beginning." (October 17)
"I hope the Fed continues to aggressively cut rates." (October 2)
“The Fed's direction of interest rate cuts is correct, rates should be lower.” (September 18)
“Powell and Trump's views on rates are correct.” (June 23)
If the stance is mapped on a 1–10 scale from Dovish to Hawkish (1 = most Dovish, 10 = most Hawkish), Hassett is probably around 2.
If nominated, Hassett will take over Milan's position as a Fed Governor in January, as Milan's short term is due to end. Then in May, as Powell's term is up, he will be promoted to Chair; with Powell expected to resign his Governor seat after announcing his intent, creating a vacancy for Trump to nominate Warsh.
While Warsh is currently Hassett's main competitor for the Chair, this text assumes he will ultimately be assimilated into the system, acting as part of the reformist force. As a former Fed Governor, Warsh has been publicly “campaigning” for a platform of structural reform, explicitly calling for a reconstruction of a “new Treasury–Fed accord” and criticizing the current Fed leadership for “surrendering to the tyranny of the status quo.” Crucially, Warsh believes the current AI-driven productivity boom is inherently deflationary, implying that the Fed is making a policy error in maintaining a tightening stance.
New Power Equilibrium
In this architecture, the Trump version of the Fed will form a dominant dovish core team, with a viable path to securing votes on most easing issues. However, this is not a done deal, as consensus will still need to be reached, and the degree of dovishness is also uncertain.
➤ Dovish Core (4 individuals):
Hassett (Chair), Warsh (Governor), Waller (Governor), Bowman (Governor)
➤ Contestables (6 individuals):
Cook (Governor), Barr (Governor), Jefferson (Governor), Kashkari (Minneapolis), Williams (New York), A. Paulson (Philadelphia)
➤ Hawkish (2 individuals):
Hammack (Cleveland), Logan (Dallas)
However, if Powell chooses not to resign his Governor seat (though historically, it is highly unlikely—a departing Chair almost always resigns, e.g., Yellen resigned 18 days after Powell was nominated), that would be an extremely bearish scenario. Because this would not only block Warsh's vacancy, but also make Powell a “shadow Chair,” exerting stronger attraction and influence over the FOMC members outside the dovish core.

Timeline: Four Stages of Market Reaction
Based on all of the above factors, the market's reaction will generally go through four distinct stages:
1. (December / January of the following year) Immediate optimism after Haslett's nomination. In the weeks following confirmation, risk assets will welcome a new chair who is seen as decisive, dovish, and loyal.
2. If Powell does not announce his resignation within three weeks, a growing sense of unease will set in. Each day of delay will reactivate the tail risk of "what if he doesn't resign?"
3. When Powell announces his resignation, the market will see a wave of euphoria.
4. As the June 2026 FOMC meeting, chaired by Haslett for the first time, approaches, market sentiment will tense up again.
Investors will be highly attuned to all public remarks from FOMC members (who will speak frequently, providing clues to their thought processes and leanings).
Risk: A Divided Committee
In a scenario where the Chair's supposed "swing vote" (which doesn't actually exist) is not present, Haslett must win debates within the FOMC to secure a majority.
If every 50bp rate cut decision is only passed by a slim 7–5 margin, this will be erosive for institutions: signaling to the market that the Chair is more of a political proxy than an independent economist.
A more extreme scenario would be: a tie at 6–6, or a 4–8 vote against rate cuts
That would be catastrophic.
The specific voting details will be released in the FOMC meeting minutes three weeks after each meeting, making the minutes release a significant market-moving event.
As for what happens after the initial meeting, that remains a huge unknown.
My basic assessment is that with a stable support of 4 votes and a credible path to garnering 10 votes, Haslett will be able to shape a dovish consensus and advance his agenda.
Implication: The market cannot fully front-run the new Fed's dovish tilt.
Interest Rate Repricing
The "dot plot" is an illusion.
While the median forecast for the December 2026 interest rate released in September is 3.4%, this number represents the median of all participants (including non-voting hawkish members).
Based on attribution analysis of public remarks, I estimate that the true median of the voting members is significantly lower at 3.1%.
When replacing Powell and Milan with Hassett and Warsh, the picture changes further.
With Milan and Waller serving as proxies for a "dovish rate-cutting bias" new regime, the 2026 voting distribution still exhibits a bimodal shape, but both peaks are lower:
Williams / Paulson / Barr → 3.1%
Hassett / Warsh / Waller → 2.6%
I anchor the new leadership's target at 2.6% to align with Milan's official forecast; however, it is worth noting that Milan has publicly stated that the "neutral rate" should be between 2.0% and 2.5%, implying that the new regime's preference may be more dovish than indicated by the "dot plot".

The market has already begun to reflect this change, with the current (as of December 2nd) pricing for the December 2026 interest rate at 3.02%, but it has not fully priced in the upcoming regime shift. If Hassett successfully pushes the committee to further lower rates, the short end of the yield curve still has approximately 40 basis points of downside.
Furthermore, if Hassett's assessment of "Supply-Side Disinflation" is correct, inflation will decline faster than market consensus, forcing the Fed to cut rates further to avoid "passive tightening" due to rising real rates.
Cross-Asset Implications
While the market's initial reaction to Hassett's nomination should be "risk-on," a more precise characterization of this institutional transition is Reflationary Steepening:
Short end: Betting on aggressive rate cuts
Duration Play: Reflecting Higher Nominal Growth (and Inflation Risk)
1. Rates
Hasset's aim is to marry a “recessionary aggressive rate cut” with “3%+ boom-time growth.”
If this policy bears fruit: the 2-year yield will collapse to front-run the cuts; the 10-year yield could stay higher due to structural growth and higher inflation risk premium.
In simple words: front-end collapse, back-end resilience, and a steepening yield curve.
2. Equities
In Hasset's view, the current policy stance is suppressing AI-driven productivity booms.
Once in office: he would push down real discount rates, prompting growth stocks into a melt-up rally driven by valuation expansion.
The biggest risk is not a recession but a spike in the long end yields, possibly triggering a bond market “rebellion.”
3. Gold
When the Fed is politically in sync with the government and explicitly prioritizes growth over inflation targets, it is the classic bull case for hard assets.
Therefore: gold should outperform treasuries as markets hedge for a replay of the ‘70s-style “over-easing, policy error” in the new regime.
4. Bitcoin
Under normal circumstances, Bitcoin would be the purest expression of this “Regime Change” trade.
However, post the October 10 event, Bitcoin has exhibited: a clear downside skew; lackluster rallies in macro bullish times; cataclysmic drops in bearish times; fear of “four-year cycle tops”; a narrative identity crisis.
I believe that by 2026, Hasset’s monetary policy alongside Trump’s deregulatory agenda will be potent enough to override this self-reinforcing pessimism.
Tech Note: About Tealbook (Fed Internal Forecasts)
Tealbook is the official economic forecasting of the Fed research department and forms the statistical baseline for FOMC debates.
It is overseen by the Division of Research & Statistics, which has over 400 economists and is led by Director Tevlin.
Like most team members, Tevlin is a Keynesian, and the Fed's core model, FRB/US, is explicitly New Keynesian.
Hasset could appoint a supply-side economist to lead the division through a Board vote.
Replacing Keynesian modelers who "think growth will bring inflation" with supply-siders who "think AI prosperity will bring deflationary pressure" would significantly change forecasts.
For example, if the model predicts inflation will drop from 2.5% to 1.8% due to productivity gains,
those FOMC members who were not originally as dovish would also be more inclined to support aggressive rate cuts.
You may also like

Stolen: $290 million, Three Parties Refusing to Acknowledge, Who Should Foot the Bill for the KelpDAO Incident Resolution?

ASTEROID Pumped 10,000x in Three Days, Is Meme Season Back on Ethereum?

ChainCatcher Hong Kong Themed Forum Highlights: Decoding the Growth Engine Under the Integration of Crypto Assets and Smart Economy

Why can this institution still grow by 150% when the scale of leading crypto VCs has shrunk significantly?

Anthropic's $1 trillion, compared to DeepSeek's $100 billion

Geopolitical Risk Persists, Is Bitcoin Becoming a Key Barometer?

Annualized 11.5%, Wall Street Buzzing: Is MicroStrategy's STRC Bitcoin's Savior or Destroyer?

An Obscure Open Source AI Tool Alerted on Kelp DAO's $292 million Bug 12 Days Ago

Mixin has launched USTD-margined perpetual contracts, bringing derivative trading into the chat scene.
The privacy-focused crypto wallet Mixin announced today the launch of its U-based perpetual contract (a derivative priced in USDT). Unlike traditional exchanges, Mixin has taken a new approach by "liberating" derivative trading from isolated matching engines and embedding it into the instant messaging environment.
Users can directly open positions within the app with leverage of up to 200x, while sharing positions, discussing strategies, and copy trading within private communities. Trading, social interaction, and asset management are integrated into the same interface.
Based on its non-custodial architecture, Mixin has eliminated friction from the traditional onboarding process, allowing users to participate in perpetual contract trading without identity verification.
The trading process has been streamlined into five steps:
· Choose the trading asset
· Select long or short
· Input position size and leverage
· Confirm order details
· Confirm and open the position
The interface provides real-time visualization of price, position, and profit and loss (PnL), allowing users to complete trades without switching between multiple modules.
Mixin has directly integrated social features into the derivative trading environment. Users can create private trading communities and interact around real-time positions:
· End-to-end encrypted private groups supporting up to 1024 members
· End-to-end encrypted voice communication
· One-click position sharing
· One-click trade copying
On the execution side, Mixin aggregates liquidity from multiple sources and accesses decentralized protocol and external market liquidity through a unified trading interface.
By combining social interaction with trade execution, Mixin enables users to collaborate, share, and execute trading strategies instantly within the same environment.
Mixin has also introduced a referral incentive system based on trading behavior:
· Users can join with an invite code
· Up to 60% of trading fees as referral rewards
· Incentive mechanism designed for long-term, sustainable earnings
This model aims to drive user-driven network expansion and organic growth.
Mixin's derivative transactions are built on top of its existing self-custody wallet infrastructure, with core features including:
· Separation of transaction account and asset storage
· User full control over assets
· Platform does not custody user funds
· Built-in privacy mechanisms to reduce data exposure
The system aims to strike a balance between transaction efficiency, asset security, and privacy protection.
Against the background of perpetual contracts becoming a mainstream trading tool, Mixin is exploring a different development direction by lowering barriers, enhancing social and privacy attributes.
The platform does not only view transactions as execution actions but positions them as a networked activity: transactions have social attributes, strategies can be shared, and relationships between individuals also become part of the financial system.
Mixin's design is based on a user-initiated, user-controlled model. The platform neither custodies assets nor executes transactions on behalf of users.
This model aligns with a statement issued by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on April 13, 2026, titled "Staff Statement on Whether Partial User Interface Used in Preparing Cryptocurrency Securities Transactions May Require Broker-Dealer Registration."
The statement indicates that, under the premise where transactions are entirely initiated and controlled by users, non-custodial service providers that offer neutral interfaces may not need to register as broker-dealers or exchanges.
Mixin is a decentralized, self-custodial privacy wallet designed to provide secure and efficient digital asset management services.
Its core capabilities include:
· Aggregation: integrating multi-chain assets and routing between different transaction paths to simplify user operations
· High liquidity access: connecting to various liquidity sources, including decentralized protocols and external markets
· Decentralization: achieving full user control over assets without relying on custodial intermediaries
· Privacy protection: safeguarding assets and data through MPC, CryptoNote, and end-to-end encrypted communication
Mixin has been in operation for over 8 years, supporting over 40 blockchains and more than 10,000 assets, with a global user base exceeding 10 million and an on-chain self-custodied asset scale of over $1 billion.

$600 million stolen in 20 days, ushering in the era of AI hackers in the crypto world

Vitalik's 2026 Hong Kong Web3 Summit Speech: Ethereum's Ultimate Vision as the "World Computer" and Future Roadmap

On the same day Aave introduced rsETH, why did Spark decide to exit?

Full Post-Mortem of the KelpDAO Incident: Why Did Aave, Which Was Not Compromised, End Up in Crisis Situation?

After a $290 million DeFi liquidation, is the security promise still there?

ZachXBT's post ignites RAVE nearing zero, what is the truth behind the insider control?

Vitalik 2026 Hong Kong Web3 Carnival Speech Transcript: We do not compete on speed; security and decentralization are the core

In-depth Analysis of RAVE Events: Short Squeeze, Crash, and Quantitative Financial Models of Liquidity Manipulation














