sUSD Depreciates by 16%: Stablecoin Myth Busted or Buying Opportunity?
Original Title: "sUSD Depegging by 16%: A Shattered Stablecoin Myth or a Buy-the-Dip Opportunity?"
Original Author: Oliver, Mars Finance
The core stablecoin of the Synthetix ecosystem, sUSD, has recently been deeply embroiled in a depegging quagmire. As of April 9, 2025, its price fell to around $0.8388, deviating over 16% from its theoretical $1 peg, attracting significant market attention. This crisis began on March 20 and has lasted for over 20 days, with the depegging magnitude continuing to expand. Meanwhile, the native token of Synthetix, SNX, has been rising against the trend, with a daily increase of 7.5%, displaying a complex market sentiment. Kain Warwick, the founder of Synthetix (@kaiynne), attributed the depegging to the transitional pains of mechanism adjustments and revealed that the protocol has sold 90% of its ETH position and increased its SNX holdings to cope.

Timeline of Events: The Progressive Deterioration of Depegging
The depegging of sUSD did not occur overnight. On March 20, 2025, its price first showed a slight deviation, initially not raising widespread alarm. However, as time passed, the volatility gradually evolved into a downward trend. By April 9, according to CoinMarketCap data, the quoted sUSD price had dropped to $0.8388, more than 16% below the pegged value. This depegging, lasting for over 20 days, not only exceeded the expected timeframe but also far surpassed the market's typical tolerance range for stablecoins, revealing the deep-seated complexity of the issue.

Kain Warwick explained this on the X platform, stating that the depegging was an expected side effect of the SIP-420 proposal's implementation. The proposal aimed to optimize the SNX staking mechanism and capital efficiency by introducing a centralized debt pool (the "420 Pool"); however, the alternation between old and new mechanisms temporarily disrupted sUSD's peg repairability. He frankly stated that at this stage, there is "no incentive for users to buy sUSD to repay debt," and the imbalance of supply and demand became the direct driver of the price decline. Additionally, the protocol's strategy of selling 90% of its ETH position and increasing its SNX holdings, while intended to strengthen internal support, may have weakened the system's liquidity and external stability foundation, adding more uncertainty to the market.
Depegging Root Cause: The Overlay of Mechanism Transition and Market Feedback
The root cause of this recent de-pegging was not singular but rather a result of intertwined mechanism adjustments and market behaviors, presenting a multi-dimensional challenge.
The implementation of SIP-420 was the core trigger of the crisis. Synthetix's stablecoin mechanism relies on overcollateralization of SNX, where users stake SNX to mint sUSD and bear the fluctuation risk of the system's debt pool. Under the old mechanism, a collateralization ratio of up to 750% and debt repayment incentives collectively maintained the stability of sUSD. However, SIP-420 shifted the individual staking model to a centralized debt pool, aiming to enhance the attractiveness of SNX staking. This transition theoretically injected long-term potential into the ecosystem, but during the transition period, it disrupted the existing equilibrium. Warwick admitted that the new mechanism has not yet fully matured, and the old anchoring stabilization feature was temporarily suspended, causing sUSD to lose its self-regulating mechanism.
Market behaviors further amplified the de-pegging effect. Data from X platform indicated that some users concentratedly exchanged sUSD for USDT or USDC on decentralized trading platforms like Curve, depleting the liquidity pool's balance through selling pressure rapidly. Taking the Curve DAI-USDC-USDT-sUSD pool as an example, the proportion of sUSD temporarily surged, reflecting a decline in market confidence in stability. With a market cap of only $25 million, sUSD itself had weak liquidity, and any concentrated selling could trigger significant slippage, causing the price to further deviate from its peg.
Protocol-level adjustments also brought about unexpected side effects. The decision to sell 90% of ETH and increase SNX holdings, while strengthening SNX's dominant position in the ecosystem, reduced the system's diversification support. ETH, as a widely accepted collateral in the market, exiting could diminish external trust in sUSD, while SNX's volatility increased concentration risk. This strategy might boost confidence during an SNX price increase, but amid a prolonged de-pegging scenario, it instead cast a shadow over the recovery process.
Historical Comparison
This is not the first time sUSD has de-pegged. Looking back to May 16, 2024, sUSD fell to $0.915 due to a whale selling sBTC for sUSD, causing a de-pegging of approximately 8.5%. At that time, insufficient Curve pool liquidity combined with MEV arbitrage bots' sniper attacks led to a brief price loss of control. Synthetix promptly took action by adding collateral such as ETH, BTC, USDC to boost confidence and providing liquidity incentives on Velodrome and Curve, successfully re-anchoring to $1 after 11 days. That de-pegging event was essentially an external shock, with the mechanism itself remaining intact and a clear and efficient path to recovery.
In contrast, the 2025 anchor break presents a starkly different scenario. This crisis stemmed from internal mechanism adjustments under SIP-420, rather than a singular external sell-off, significantly increasing the complexity of the issue. The 2024 anchor break lasted for 11 days with an 8.5% drop, while the current one has surpassed 20 days with a drop of over 16%, indicating the severity and persistence of the problem. Furthermore, the response in 2024 relied on liquidity incentives and collateral diversification, whereas the 2025 strategy leans more towards internal adjustments (such as selling ETH to increase SNX exposure), with short-term effects yet to materialize. This indicates that the experiences of 2024 cannot be directly applied, with the repair difficulty far exceeding the past.
Feasibility Analysis of Buying the Dip in sUSD
The current sUSD price hovers around $0.84. For investors, is it feasible to buy the dip and wait for a re-anchor? The experience of 2024 provides some insights. Back then, sUSD rebounded from $0.915 to $1, and dip buyers saw around a 9% return within two weeks, with the key to success lying in quick incentive measures and the short-lived nature of external shocks. Now the price is lower ($0.84), the potential returns are higher (around 19%), but the risks are also magnified.
Positive factors should not be overlooked. The 7.5% increase in SNX reflects market confidence in Synthetix remaining intact, with the team's proactive stance and debt relief plan injecting hope into the recovery. With a small market cap, sUSD requires low funds, and if the protocol introduces incentives, even small buy orders can drive up the price. However, the risks are significant as well. The anchor break has exceeded 20 days, and the duration is unknown. If new mechanism debugging is delayed, the repair may be prolonged for months. Selling pressure remains, pool imbalances on Curve may further depress prices, and the loss of user confidence may weaken demand.

Using $100,000 as an example, buying around 119,000 sUSD at $0.84, if it re-anchors to $1, one could profit $19,000, with a return of 19%. However, it is advised to set a stop-loss level (e.g., $0.75) and closely monitor protocol announcements. If Synthetix introduces incentives similar to those in 2024, the odds of buying the dip will significantly increase. If the price stabilizes and SNX continues to rise, a small position can be established. Compared to the low-risk window of 2024, this opportunity offers higher returns but comes with greater uncertainty.
Market Response and SNX's Anomaly
Despite sUSD being deeply embroiled in an anchor break crisis, SNX recorded a 7.5% single-day increase on April 9th, a striking contrast. The market's optimism may stem from expectations of long-term benefits from SIP-420. If the new mechanism is successfully implemented, it could enhance SNX's staking rewards and ecosystem position, boosting Synthetix's competitiveness in the DeFi space. The "Debt Jubilee" debt relief plan mentioned by Warwick may also inject confidence into investors, implying that clearing historical debts will lighten the system's burden.
The community reaction has been polarized. On the X platform, some users are concerned that sUSD may fall into a "death spiral," questioning the rationale behind the mechanism adjustment. On the other hand, some believe that the $25 million market cap of sUSD has limited impact, and that SNX's rise is the true reflection of market confidence. Professional analysis firms such as The Merkle News have pointed out that the transitional risk of SIP-420 was underestimated, but SNX's performance indicates that Synthetix still has the potential to turn the situation around.
Summary
From an industry perspective, the impact of sUSD's de-pegging is relatively limited. Its $25 million market cap is negligible in the stablecoin market, far below the scale of USDT or USDC, and has a small spillover effect on the DeFi ecosystem. However, for Synthetix internally, persistent de-pegging may shake user trust. If liquidity continues to drain from the pools, the utility of sUSD will be limited, further weakening its position in synthetic asset trading.
In the short term, intensified de-pegging may lead to more sell-offs, putting further pressure on the price. However, SNX's resilience has bought the protocol a time window. If the new mechanism can stabilize in the coming weeks, coupled with a debt relief plan, sUSD still has a chance to re-peg. In the long term, Synthetix needs to learn from this crisis, optimize stablecoin design, and avoid a similar crisis recurrence. The success of the mechanism adjustment will determine whether it can stand firm in the fiercely competitive DeFi market.
Unlike the external shock of 2024, the endogeneity of this crisis makes its path to recovery more tortuous. The Synthetix team must work on both mechanism optimization and rebuilding market confidence to weather the storm. For investors, the $0.84 sUSD is both a risk exposure and a potential opportunity. Whether bottom fishing or waiting and watching, closely monitoring the protocol's subsequent dynamics will be crucial. In this de-pegging storm, Synthetix's future direction is worth continuous tracking.
You may also like

From x402 to MPP: Cloudflare's crucial vote, will it go to Coinbase or Stripe?

BlackRock CEO issues annual open letter: The wave of tokenization has arrived, and we will lead this trend

When Backpack backstabs the community

When gold is no longer a safe haven, and Bitcoin continues to panic

Trump, the World's Largest Oil Trader

If the US and Iran have not reached an agreement in 5 days, what other cards does Trump have?

Tether Whale Dumps £12 Million, Backing Crypto’s ‘British Trump’

Ethereum Foundation Post: Rethinking the Division of Work Between L1 and L2 to Build the Ultimate Ethereum Ecosystem

Two Major Prediction Market Platforms Unite Rarely, What Is the Story Behind This New Fund?

WEEX Official Product Launch: Win LALIGA Tickets & Unlock the 3-in-1 Crypto Trading Suite
Trade crypto without downloading an app. Join the WEEX H5, API, SKILLs livestream to explore the new trading experience, win LALIGA VIP tickets, and share 420 USDT rewards.

Dragonfly Partners: Most agents will not engage in autonomous trading, how can crypto payments prevail?

US AI Startup Goes All In on Chinese Mega-Model | Rewire News Morning Brief

Trump Lies Again: A "Five-Day Pause" Psyop, How Wall Street, Bitcoin, and Polymarket Insiders Synced Uposciogen

When a Token Becomes Labor, People Become the Interface

Ceasefire News Leaked Ahead of Time? Large Polymarket Bets on Outcome Before Trump's Tweet

BlackRock CEO's Annual Shareholder Letter: How is Wall Street Using AI to Keep Profiting from National Pension Funds?

Sun Valley Releases 2025 Financial Report: Bitcoin Mining Revenue Reaches $670 Million, Accelerating Transformation to AI Infrastructure Platform
On March 16, 2026, in Dallas, Texas, USA, CanGu Company (New York Stock Exchange code: CANG, hereinafter referred to as "CanGu" or the "Company") today announced its unaudited financial performance for the fourth quarter and full year ended December 31, 2025. As a btc-42">bitcoin mining enterprise relying on a globally operated layout and dedicated to building an integrated energy and AI computing power platform, CanGu is actively advancing its business transformation and infrastructure development.
• Financial Performance:
Total revenue for the full year 2025 was $688.1 million, with $179.5 million in the fourth quarter.
Bitcoin mining business revenue for the full year was $675.5 million, with $172.4 million in the fourth quarter.
Full-year adjusted EBITDA was $24.5 million, while the fourth quarter was -$156.3 million.
• Mining Operations and Costs:
A total of 6,594.6 bitcoins were mined throughout the year, averaging 18.07 bitcoins per day; of which 1,718.3 bitcoins were mined in the fourth quarter, averaging 18.68 bitcoins per day.
The average mining cost for the full year (excluding miner depreciation) was $79,707 per bitcoin, and for the fourth quarter, it was $84,552;
The all-in sustaining costs were $97,272 and $106,251 per bitcoin, respectively.
As of the end of December 2025, the company has cumulatively produced 7,528.4 bitcoins since entering the bitcoin mining business.
• Strategic Progress:
The company has completed the termination of the American Depositary Receipt (ADR) program and transitioned to a direct listing on the NYSE to enhance information transparency and align with its strategic direction, with a long-term goal of expanding its investor base.
CEO Paul Yu stated: "2025 marked the company's first full year as a bitcoin mining enterprise, characterized by rapid execution and structural reshaping. We completed a comprehensive adjustment of our asset system and established a globally distributed mining network. Additionally, the company introduced a new management team, further strengthening our capabilities and competitive advantage in the digital asset and energy infrastructure space. The completion of the NYSE direct listing and USD pricing also signifies our transformation into a global AI infrastructure company."
"As we enter 2026, the company will continue to optimize its balance sheet structure and enhance operational efficiency and cost resilience through adjustments to the miner portfolio. At the same time, we are advancing our strategic transformation into an AI infrastructure provider. Leveraging EcoHash, we will utilize our capabilities in scalable computing power and energy networks to provide cost-effective AI inference solutions. The relevant site transformations and product development are progressing simultaneously, and the company is well-positioned to sustain its execution in the new phase."
The company's Chief Financial Officer, Michael Zhang, stated: "By 2025, the company is expected to achieve significant revenue growth through its scaled mining operations. Despite recording a net loss of $452.8 million from ongoing operations, mainly due to one-time transformation costs and market-driven fair value adjustments, the company, from a financial perspective, will reduce its leverage, optimize its Bitcoin reserve strategy and liquidity management, introduce new capital to strengthen its financial position, and seize investment opportunities in high-potential areas such as AI infrastructure while navigating market volatility."
The total revenue for the fourth quarter was $1.795 billion. Of this, the Bitcoin mining business contributed $1.724 billion in revenue, generating 1,718.3 Bitcoins during the quarter. Revenue from the international automobile trading business was $4.8 million.
The total operating costs and expenses for the fourth quarter amounted to $4.56 billion, primarily attributed to expenses related to the Bitcoin mining business, as well as impairment of mining machines and fair value losses on Bitcoin collateral receivables.
This includes:
· Cost of Revenue (excluding depreciation): $1.553 billion
· Cost of Revenue (depreciation): $38.1 million
· Operating Expenses: $9.9 million (including related-party expenses of $1.1 million)
· Mining Machine Impairment Loss: $81.4 million
· Fair Value Loss on Bitcoin Collateral Receivables: $171.4 million
The operating loss for the fourth quarter was $276.6 million, a significant increase from a loss of $0.7 million in the same period of 2024, primarily due to the downward trend in Bitcoin prices.
The net loss from ongoing operations was $285 million, compared to a net profit of $2.4 million in the same period last year.
The adjusted EBITDA was -$156.3 million, compared to $2.4 million in the same period last year.
The total revenue for the full year was $6.881 billion. Of this, the revenue from the Bitcoin mining business was $6.755 billion, with a total output of 6,594.6 Bitcoins for the year. Revenue from the international automobile trading business was $9.8 million.
The total annual operating costs and expenses amount to $1.1 billion.
Specifically, they include:
· Revenue Cost (excluding depreciation): $543.3 million
· Revenue Cost (depreciation): $116.6 million
· Operating Expenses: $28.9 million (including related-party expenses of $1.1 million)
· Miner Impairment Loss: $338.3 million
· Bitcoin Collateral Receivable Fair Value Change Loss: $96.5 million
The full-year operating loss is $437.1 million. The continuing operations net loss is $452.8 million, while in 2024, there was a net profit of $4.8 million.
The 2025 non-GAAP adjusted net profit is $24.5 million (compared to $5.7 million in 2024). This measure does not include share-based compensation expenses; refer to "Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures" for details.
As of December 31, 2025, the company's key assets and liabilities are as follows:
· Cash and Cash Equivalents: $41.2 million
· Bitcoin Collateral Receivable (Non-current, related party): $663.0 million
· Miner Net Value: $248.7 million
· Long-Term Debt (related party): $557.6 million
In February 2026, the company sold 4,451 bitcoins and repaid a portion of related-party long-term debt to reduce financial leverage and optimize the asset-liability structure.
As per the stock repurchase plan disclosed on March 13, 2025, as of December 31, 2025, the company had repurchased a total of 890,155 shares of Class A common stock for approximately $1.2 million.

