Timeline | OM plunges over 80% – Whose "Fault" Is It: Team, Liquidity Provider, or Investor?
In the early morning, the RWA sector project MANTRA (OM) experienced a rapid 90% drop, plummeting from $6 to $0.5, causing its market value to plummet by over $5.5 billion. Three hours later, the MANTRA team released a statement indicating that the drop was triggered by an irrational liquidation event unrelated to the project itself, asserting that it was not the team's doing. Subsequently, OM rebounded from around $0.5 to $1.2, experiencing a brief price spike. According to Coinglass data, within a mere four hours, the amount of OM contracts liquidated reached $58 million.
Prior to this steep decline, OM had gone through multiple violent price surge phases since November last year, earning the nickname "Strong Whale Demon Coin" from the community. Related reading: "After Evaporating $5.5 Billion in 15 Minutes and Surging 4x, Why Did the 'Demon Coin' OM Suddenly Crash?". So, what is the truth behind this sudden drop? Was it truly caused by off-exchange trading liquidations? BlockBeats will continue to monitor and provide real-time updates. Below is a timeline of the events:
9:06 AM: 10 OM positions worth over a million dollars liquidated in the past 12 hours
At 9:06 AM, according to Coinglass data, 10 OM positions worth over a million dollars were liquidated in the past 12 hours.
On-chain Monitoring: Ahead of OM's Flash Crash, 4.5% of the circulating supply transferred to CEX with strategic investor Laser Digital suspected to be involved
At 8:40 AM, as per The Data Nerd's monitoring, 6 hours prior to OM's price plummet from $6 to 90% down to $0.4, over the past 3 days, 24.4 million OM tokens (equivalent to approximately $143.94 million at the time) were moved from 5 wallets to OKX. Four wallets had the same operational pattern: withdrawals from Binance last month followed by deposits to OKX.
At 8:55 AM, according to Lookonchain monitoring, prior to OM's collapse (since April 7), at least 17 wallets deposited 43.6 million OM (equivalent to $227 million at the time) to a CEX, accounting for 4.5% of the circulating supply. Based on Arkham's tags, two of the addresses are associated with Laser Digital. Laser Digital is a strategic investor in MANTRA.
At 9:56 AM, according to Spot On Chain monitoring, just 3 days before the crash, a certain OM whale group transferred 14.27 million OM tokens at an average price of $6.375 (approximately $91 million at the time) to OKX. Back in late March, they had collectively withdrawn 84.15 million OM tokens from Binance, totaling around $564.7 million (at an average of $6.711). Now, after experiencing about a 90% plummet, their remaining 69.08 million OM tokens are only worth $62.2 million — an estimated total loss of up to $406.3 million. Spot On Chain suggests they may have hedged this portion of their position elsewhere, which may have been one of the reasons for this crash.
At 8:28 AM: The total net open interest in OM contracts reached $136 million, with a 24-hour decrease of 60.95%; in nearly 12 hours, the total liquidation amount exceeded $65 million, second only to Bitcoin
According to Coinglass data, the total net open interest in OM contracts was $136 million, with a holding of 134 million OM tokens, experiencing a 24-hour decrease of 60.95%. Binance held the highest market share, with an OM contract position of $33.038 million, accounting for 24.33%. Additionally, in the past nearly 12 hours, the total liquidation amount for OM exceeded $65 million, with long liquidations amounting to $47.3255 million. In this period, the liquidation volume of this currency was second only to Bitcoin.

MANTRA Founder: OM Crash Not Due to Binance, but Caused by Improper Forced Liquidations on Other CEXs
At 7:16 AM, MANTRA founder JP Mullin responded to the OM crash event on social media, stating that this market imbalance was not caused by the team, MANTRA Chain Association, its core advisors, or MANTRA's investors selling tokens, nor was it due to Binance, but rather improper forced liquidations on other CEXs.
JP Mullin indicated that this market imbalance was not caused by the team, MANTRA Chain Association, its core advisors, or MANTRA's investors selling tokens. The tokens remain in a locked state and follow the previously announced unlock schedule. In the next few hours, the team will host a community AMA on Platform X to further discuss these events.

4:51 AM: OM Responds to Early Morning Flash Crash: Volatility Caused by Disorderly Liquidation, Not Team's Doing
At 4:51 AM, the MANTRA community released a statement stating that today's OM's abnormal volatility was caused by a "disorderly liquidation," unrelated to the project itself, and emphasizing that the event was not caused by the team. The official team stated that they are investigating the specific reasons and will announce more details soon.
MANTRA stated that the timing and depth of the crash indicate that account positions were closed very abruptly and without sufficient warning or notice. This situation occurred during a period of low liquidity in the early morning Asian time zone, which at least indicates a certain degree of negligence on the part of the CEX or could possibly be intentional market manipulation.
“CEX partners play a crucial role in providing liquidity for projects like ours. We work closely with them; however, they still have significant discretion. When this discretion is exercised without proper internal and external oversight, as it may have been recently, market dislocation can occur, harming the interests of the project and investors. It needs to be clarified that this market dislocation was not caused by the team, MANTRA Chain Association, its core advisors, or MANTRA's investors selling off tokens. The tokens remain locked and are subject to the disclosed vesting periods. OM's tokenomics remain unchanged, as stated in our latest token report last week. Our token wallet addresses are online and visible.”

4:00 AM: Liquidity Provider's Algorithm Abnormally Drives up BTCDOM Perpetual Contract by 20%
At 4:01 AM, according to Formula News, an unidentified liquidity provider experienced an algorithm error following OM's (Mantra) flash crash, unintentionally driving up the Binance platform's BTCDOM (Bitcoin Dominance Index) perpetual contract by 20%.
The BTCDOM index includes the top 20 cryptocurrencies by market capitalization on Binance and Binance Futures, excluding BTC and stablecoins, with OM's weight at only about 5%. The unusual fluctuation is suspected to have resulted from the liquidity provider mistakenly interpreting the sharp price movement of OM as a structural change in the market, triggering a strategic buy-in operation in error.
3:00 AM: CZ Responds to OM's Flash Crash: Do Not Chase Narratives, CEX Should No Longer Have Listing Processes, Investors Should Decide on Trading Pairs Themselves
Around 3:00 AM, CZ, following OM's drop, posted on Platform X advising investors, “Do not chase narratives. Stick to fundamental projects with users, revenue, and profits.” In response to the community's questioning of whether "Binance platform had conducted due diligence on OM's flash crash," CZ once again emphasized that CEX should no longer have listing processes, and investors should decide on trading pairs themselves.

2 AM: OM Suffers Sudden Crash, Over 80% 24-hour Loss
Around 2 AM on April 14, according to HTX market data, OM experienced a short-term drop of over 67%. Additionally, Coinglass data shows that within the last hour, OM saw $28.61 million in liquidations, with long liquidations accounting for around $28.14 million and short liquidations around $0.47 million. Subsequently, OM's 24-hour loss expanded to 80%.
You may also like

From x402 to MPP: Cloudflare's crucial vote, will it go to Coinbase or Stripe?

BlackRock CEO issues annual open letter: The wave of tokenization has arrived, and we will lead this trend

When Backpack backstabs the community

When gold is no longer a safe haven, and Bitcoin continues to panic

Trump, the World's Largest Oil Trader

If the US and Iran have not reached an agreement in 5 days, what other cards does Trump have?

Tether Whale Dumps £12 Million, Backing Crypto’s ‘British Trump’

Ethereum Foundation Post: Rethinking the Division of Work Between L1 and L2 to Build the Ultimate Ethereum Ecosystem

Two Major Prediction Market Platforms Unite Rarely, What Is the Story Behind This New Fund?

Dragonfly Partners: Most agents will not engage in autonomous trading, how can crypto payments prevail?

US AI Startup Goes All In on Chinese Mega-Model | Rewire News Morning Brief

Trump Lies Again: A "Five-Day Pause" Psyop, How Wall Street, Bitcoin, and Polymarket Insiders Synced Uposciogen

When a Token Becomes Labor, People Become the Interface

Ceasefire News Leaked Ahead of Time? Large Polymarket Bets on Outcome Before Trump's Tweet

BlackRock CEO's Annual Shareholder Letter: How is Wall Street Using AI to Keep Profiting from National Pension Funds?

Sun Valley Releases 2025 Financial Report: Bitcoin Mining Revenue Reaches $670 Million, Accelerating Transformation to AI Infrastructure Platform
On March 16, 2026, in Dallas, Texas, USA, CanGu Company (New York Stock Exchange code: CANG, hereinafter referred to as "CanGu" or the "Company") today announced its unaudited financial performance for the fourth quarter and full year ended December 31, 2025. As a btc-42">bitcoin mining enterprise relying on a globally operated layout and dedicated to building an integrated energy and AI computing power platform, CanGu is actively advancing its business transformation and infrastructure development.
• Financial Performance:
Total revenue for the full year 2025 was $688.1 million, with $179.5 million in the fourth quarter.
Bitcoin mining business revenue for the full year was $675.5 million, with $172.4 million in the fourth quarter.
Full-year adjusted EBITDA was $24.5 million, while the fourth quarter was -$156.3 million.
• Mining Operations and Costs:
A total of 6,594.6 bitcoins were mined throughout the year, averaging 18.07 bitcoins per day; of which 1,718.3 bitcoins were mined in the fourth quarter, averaging 18.68 bitcoins per day.
The average mining cost for the full year (excluding miner depreciation) was $79,707 per bitcoin, and for the fourth quarter, it was $84,552;
The all-in sustaining costs were $97,272 and $106,251 per bitcoin, respectively.
As of the end of December 2025, the company has cumulatively produced 7,528.4 bitcoins since entering the bitcoin mining business.
• Strategic Progress:
The company has completed the termination of the American Depositary Receipt (ADR) program and transitioned to a direct listing on the NYSE to enhance information transparency and align with its strategic direction, with a long-term goal of expanding its investor base.
CEO Paul Yu stated: "2025 marked the company's first full year as a bitcoin mining enterprise, characterized by rapid execution and structural reshaping. We completed a comprehensive adjustment of our asset system and established a globally distributed mining network. Additionally, the company introduced a new management team, further strengthening our capabilities and competitive advantage in the digital asset and energy infrastructure space. The completion of the NYSE direct listing and USD pricing also signifies our transformation into a global AI infrastructure company."
"As we enter 2026, the company will continue to optimize its balance sheet structure and enhance operational efficiency and cost resilience through adjustments to the miner portfolio. At the same time, we are advancing our strategic transformation into an AI infrastructure provider. Leveraging EcoHash, we will utilize our capabilities in scalable computing power and energy networks to provide cost-effective AI inference solutions. The relevant site transformations and product development are progressing simultaneously, and the company is well-positioned to sustain its execution in the new phase."
The company's Chief Financial Officer, Michael Zhang, stated: "By 2025, the company is expected to achieve significant revenue growth through its scaled mining operations. Despite recording a net loss of $452.8 million from ongoing operations, mainly due to one-time transformation costs and market-driven fair value adjustments, the company, from a financial perspective, will reduce its leverage, optimize its Bitcoin reserve strategy and liquidity management, introduce new capital to strengthen its financial position, and seize investment opportunities in high-potential areas such as AI infrastructure while navigating market volatility."
The total revenue for the fourth quarter was $1.795 billion. Of this, the Bitcoin mining business contributed $1.724 billion in revenue, generating 1,718.3 Bitcoins during the quarter. Revenue from the international automobile trading business was $4.8 million.
The total operating costs and expenses for the fourth quarter amounted to $4.56 billion, primarily attributed to expenses related to the Bitcoin mining business, as well as impairment of mining machines and fair value losses on Bitcoin collateral receivables.
This includes:
· Cost of Revenue (excluding depreciation): $1.553 billion
· Cost of Revenue (depreciation): $38.1 million
· Operating Expenses: $9.9 million (including related-party expenses of $1.1 million)
· Mining Machine Impairment Loss: $81.4 million
· Fair Value Loss on Bitcoin Collateral Receivables: $171.4 million
The operating loss for the fourth quarter was $276.6 million, a significant increase from a loss of $0.7 million in the same period of 2024, primarily due to the downward trend in Bitcoin prices.
The net loss from ongoing operations was $285 million, compared to a net profit of $2.4 million in the same period last year.
The adjusted EBITDA was -$156.3 million, compared to $2.4 million in the same period last year.
The total revenue for the full year was $6.881 billion. Of this, the revenue from the Bitcoin mining business was $6.755 billion, with a total output of 6,594.6 Bitcoins for the year. Revenue from the international automobile trading business was $9.8 million.
The total annual operating costs and expenses amount to $1.1 billion.
Specifically, they include:
· Revenue Cost (excluding depreciation): $543.3 million
· Revenue Cost (depreciation): $116.6 million
· Operating Expenses: $28.9 million (including related-party expenses of $1.1 million)
· Miner Impairment Loss: $338.3 million
· Bitcoin Collateral Receivable Fair Value Change Loss: $96.5 million
The full-year operating loss is $437.1 million. The continuing operations net loss is $452.8 million, while in 2024, there was a net profit of $4.8 million.
The 2025 non-GAAP adjusted net profit is $24.5 million (compared to $5.7 million in 2024). This measure does not include share-based compensation expenses; refer to "Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures" for details.
As of December 31, 2025, the company's key assets and liabilities are as follows:
· Cash and Cash Equivalents: $41.2 million
· Bitcoin Collateral Receivable (Non-current, related party): $663.0 million
· Miner Net Value: $248.7 million
· Long-Term Debt (related party): $557.6 million
In February 2026, the company sold 4,451 bitcoins and repaid a portion of related-party long-term debt to reduce financial leverage and optimize the asset-liability structure.
As per the stock repurchase plan disclosed on March 13, 2025, as of December 31, 2025, the company had repurchased a total of 890,155 shares of Class A common stock for approximately $1.2 million.

The US AI Startup Is Loving China's Open Source Model

