Unveiling the South Korean Cryptocurrency Market: A Coin-Trading Powerhouse Where Even 70-Year-Old Grandmothers Line Up to Open Accounts
Recently, with the skyrocketing of "ancient coins" such as XRP, the news of "Korean moms rushing into the crypto market" has once again spread in the community. At the same time, the trading volume of related tokens such as XRP and APT on Korean exchanges such as Upbit and Bithumb has even surpassed Binance at one point. In other words, the trading volume of just the Korean market on these tokens is enough to rival the total trading volume of the rest of the world.
For a long time, the crypto community has seen listing on Upbit as a great boon for projects. After a token is listed on these Korean exchanges, the price often experiences a rapid surge in a short period of time. This strong buying power has made the world curious about the "Kimchi Premium." How does the South Korean cryptocurrency market operate? What kind of pumping logic do investors here have?
BlockBeats conducted an interview with Andy, a member of Frax Finance, who has been involved in crypto development and education in Korea for years, delving into the investment logic and real situation of the Korean crypto market.
Related Readings:
《How did "zombie coins" suddenly come back to life?》
《"Demon coin manufacturer," Upbit is seizing pricing power in the crypto market》
The "Another Stock Market" for Koreans
BlockBeats: You have seen very strong development in the Korean market, such as heavy buying, etc. How do people enter the cryptocurrency market here, and how do they choose which coins to invest in?
Andy: To be honest, this is still a puzzle that everyone is trying to solve. One thing I am certain of is that DeFi is quite weak here because the on and off-ramping is very easy on exchanges. I am a Canadian citizen and have lived in Korea for 10 years. In the early days, I could trade on Upbit and Bithumb. I remember at that time, I could open a bank account and link it to Upbit or Bithumb, and complete all the operations in just five minutes, easily trading and withdrawing in Korean won.
So in Korea, everyone can easily enter the crypto market and invest, which is not difficult, although they have to open an account at a specific bank. Secondly, I think the act of trading cryptocurrency is imbued with a bit of "glimmer of hope" among Korean investors, especially in the 20 to 30 age group.
Moreover, Korean media are all discussing this topic. You can see that people from their 20s to even 60s or 70s are participating in the crypto market. I don't know if you've heard about it, but in front of Bithumb's office building, there were elderly people from 50 to 70 years old crowded, trying to open accounts, especially when a new bull market was starting.
BlockBeats: Did this happen during the last bull market or this current one?
Andy: It was during this current bull market, just in the recent one or two weeks, and it was all reported in the news.
Retired elderly people aged 50 to 70 were lining up to open accounts, and the queue had even exceeded 3,000 numbers, which was truly crazy. Mainstream media and social networks are also discussing the cryptocurrency secondary market. Although mainstream media often tend to depict its risks, as Bitcoin reaches a new all-time high, more and more people are starting to pay attention.

According to media reports, a nearly 60-year-old homemaker, while waiting in line to open an account, said: "I feel like it's a waste to keep my retirement pension in a bank account, so I tried investing in Bitcoin and Dogecoin"; image source from the internet
As for the younger generation, I think many young people in their early 20s see this as an opportunity akin to buying lottery tickets. I don't want to say it's gambling, but they do indeed view cryptocurrency as a way to make money quickly because the media they are exposed to often report more on people making a lot of money through cryptocurrency, which is more attractive than news about losses. Many people in their 30s are a bit more strategic, attempting to understand the projects behind the tokens, but even so, many of my friends would still buy the token first and then inquire within the community about what the project is about, so in fact, most people do not truly understand the project.
This mindset may stem from a strong Fear of Missing Out (FOMO), a mentality that is also prevalent in Korean culture, where the trend-following culture is extremely extreme. Whether in entertainment or investment, many people feel that if they do not participate, they will fall behind the trend and even feel disconnected from the entire culture. So if you are unsure about what you are investing in, it may be due to fear of missing out on an opportunity, or because friends have advised you to join in.
Having lived in Canada, where everything is relatively more relaxed, I never felt pressured to keep up. However, after coming to Korea, I felt the prevalence of a fast-paced lifestyle in society, such as having to graduate at a certain age, serve in the military, get married, find a job, and even engage in investments. So when those around you are all trading cryptocurrency on Upbit or Bithumb, you would feel that you cannot fall behind. I believe that many people are being driven by FOMO, afraid of falling behind others in investment, especially when they see friends starting to make money, this feeling becomes even stronger.
BlockBeats: So, in the past few years, has the DYOR culture (Do Your Own Research) developed in the Korean crypto market?
Andy: I have been working in the crypto field for seven years and have been living in Korea. I have indeed seen more and more educational and research platforms emerge, with many offline events and Web2 projects also getting involved, truly starting to help people understand and learn about cryptocurrency. More and more investors do indeed conduct their own research before purchasing tokens. Many Key Opinion Leaders (KOLs) are also discussing various aspects of cryptocurrency, including NFTs and other projects, and teaching people how to move funds from centralized exchanges to participate in airdrops or staking.
However, the reason why Korean exchanges often rival Binance in trading volume is mainly because most funds remain within the exchange. For example, when I tell someone about a pool with a 100% annual percentage yield (APY) and explain that all they need to do is move their tokens from the platform to a wallet like MetaMask and then bridge to another chain for staking, many people give up trying because the process seems overly complicated. I believe this is an area where our educational efforts need significant improvement. In terms of DeFi and wallet usage, Korea still lags far behind compared to the United States and other regions.
Here, most traders simply execute trades on the platform, and their funds do not leave the centralized exchange to enter personal wallets. Of course, a younger demographic, such as people in their 20s and 30s, do conduct some research and are willing to try out these projects. However, compared to the total market participants, this demographic is relatively small.
BlockBeats: So, can we consider the cryptocurrency market in Korea to be as large as the stock market, or at least comparable?
Andy: I think this comparison is reasonable. I believe that at least in terms of media attention, cryptocurrency indeed holds a significant share. The frequency of discussions about cryptocurrency is similar to that of the stock market. However, unlike the stock market, cryptocurrency is not seen as the preferred choice, and its image is not as positive as that of the stock market.
If the stock market experiences a decline, media reports may attribute it to "government policies being ineffective" or "Korea's financial and economic situation being unfavorable." However, if Bitcoin suddenly drops by 40%, the media often say, "Look, this has happened again, this is why cryptocurrency is so risky, it has ruined many people's lives." Therefore, the public perception of these two markets is different.
However, in reality, we know that as long as you do enough research, cryptocurrency is relatively safe. Although its volatility is greater than the stock market, if you understand what you're doing, it's not as dangerous as imagined. If I know nothing about a token and just follow the trend to buy a meme coin, and then it suddenly drops by 80%, then obviously I would think it's a scam. But if I knew in advance what I was investing in and didn't do enough homework, then the loss is expected, and that's the difference.
BlockBeats: In your opinion, how much does negative media coverage affect South Korean cryptocurrency investors?
Andy: This is a very interesting thing. Many media outlets have been promoting the dangers of cryptocurrency, advising people not to participate, but in fact, this may have attracted more people to try it. Because many people just follow the trend, not because they truly understand cryptocurrency.
South Korea is a country that pays a lot of attention to trends, whether it's music, fashion, or other fields, everyone always pursues the latest trend, and the same goes for cryptocurrency. "Everyone is investing in cryptocurrency trading, so I have to participate too", "Everyone is talking about Bitcoin, so I have to join in". When I get into a taxi and the driver starts asking, "Have you heard of Bitcoin?" That's usually my signal to sell some tokens.
But during a bear market, the general public no longer discusses Bitcoin, yet the market's trading volume remains high. If you observe those who are truly focused on the crypto market and do their own research, they are actually very smart, closely following market trends, and sometimes their information is even faster than mine, especially regarding news about new projects. In Korea, there are some "crypto enthusiasts" who are very smart and are well-versed in all the latest developments in the crypto market.
The Logic of Coin Speculation by South Korean Retail Investors, Why APT and XRP Are the Hottest?
BlockBeats: Is meme coins a popular trend in the South Korean market?
Andy: Based on my personal experience, they do not often trade meme coins. This is not hard to understand; just think about it, these coins are basically not on the centralized exchange's listing, and people usually trade the existing tokens on the platform with the Korean Won. Moodeng recently listed on Bithumb, and I think this might bring some changes.
However, Dogecoin is still quite popular in South Korea. But I bet many people may not know that Dogecoin actually has no supply limit. Recently, people just thought of Dogecoin as equal to Musk, and now that Musk has a good relationship with Trump, and the latter is about to become president, there is a strong bullish sentiment towards Dogecoin.
Overall, once the price of a token starts to soar in South Korea, it will lead to a large influx of funds, driving the price further up because people will sell off other assets and switch to Dogecoin or other tokens with strong upward momentum. This is another manifestation of the FOMO effect. I even think that many people in South Korea trade Solana, but they do not use SOL to buy meme coins in the on-chain ecosystem.
BlockBeats: Since it's not to participate in the ecosystem, why still buy Solana? What are other popular assets in South Korea?
Andy: I think this is mainly because Solana is a globally popular token, and you will see many tokens like Solana that are popular worldwide being bought by Koreans. But you will also see that some tokens that are not very popular in other regions, or haven't been heard of much, still have a large trading volume in Korea. For example, Aptos, whose token APT has the highest trading volume in Korea.
In the Korean crypto market, there are some peculiar phenomena. Many people buy tokens like SEI and SUI simply because they sound like girls' names, and there is a circulating online meme that "buying SEI and SUI will help you find a pretty girlfriend." A similar situation exists with APT, which means "apartment." So people would say "Buying APT will help you buy an apartment, buying ONDO will help you buy a condominium." Such internet memes actually have a significant impact on the market. Therefore, we can see some tokens that are not well-known outside Korea have huge trading volumes here just because many people do not understand them but still follow the trend and purchase, which is quite crazy.
BlockBeats: Was the recent hit pop song "APT" by Roise also one of the influencing factors?
Andy: Aptos was already very popular before that. In fact, this is a case study I have been researching to see what the Aptos team did right, how projects like IQ or Frax can enter the Korean market and successfully establish themselves like Ondo or Aptos. I think this is also why the founder of Aptos often comes to Korea. I often see him now and I am no longer surprised, so the way the Korean market operates is indeed somewhat strange.
But one thing is certain: first, many trades happened on centralized exchanges; second, people haven't done much in-depth research. I think it can be summarized like this: traders of meme coins in other parts of the world trade meme coins, while in Korea, people don't trade meme coins but trade other cryptocurrencies in a way that mimics trading meme coins.
BlockBeats: Some time ago, XRP's price skyrocketed, and its trading volume on Upbit even surpassed Binance's at one point. Why is XRP so popular in Korea?
Andy: XRP has actually been popular in Korea for five, six, or seven years. I remember the first cryptocurrency I bought was XRP. At that time, I had no idea what I was buying—it was before I entered this industry, I was just a college student. I bought it because my relative told me, "Buy this coin called XRP; it will rise to $10," so I bought some. Then the SEC lawsuit happened, but even so, its popularity in Korea did not wane.
It's a bit like EOS; maybe not many people talk about it now, but there is still an active EOS community in Korea, and occasionally the price surges due to Korea's push. As for why EOS is so popular, I can't really say.
As for why Ripple is popular, I think it's because people believe it is the "next big thing," especially when it fights against the government and wins. This narrative becomes particularly strong, especially in the United States. I don't have a definite answer, but what I can say for sure is that Ripple is indeed very hot in Korea. Especially after the news of their victory against the SEC came out, its popularity returned.
So I think for a token to become popular in Korea, it first needs to gain some recognition globally, then it can enter the Korean market. But this is not the case for every token; Aptos seems to have risen in Korea first.
However, I also know that most traders, including myself, are not deeply involved in the XRP ecosystem. I don't know much about their technology and specific developments. And many people are aware that they are going to launch their stablecoin, which I think is also a factor that could drive the market. In Korea, stablecoins don't have a particularly good image due to the impact of the Terra/Luna event.
BlockBeats: The Luna event had a significant impact in Korea, right? Many institutions invested a large amount of money.
Andy: Yes, the situation was very bad. I remember there were many news reports at the time saying that someone committed suicide because of this incident, which was truly tragic. I also know that some of Korea's major venture capital firms invested a lot of funds into it, only to suffer huge losses, with many institutions being severely hit. So, apart from stablecoins like USDT and USDC, the narrative around stablecoins in Korea is still not very positive.
BlockBeats: Another interesting phenomenon is the high premium issue on Korean exchanges. Are Korean investors aware of this, and what is their attitude towards it?
Andy: Yes, they are definitely aware of the "Kimchi Premium." In earlier years, someone would use a credit card to buy on one platform and then sell on another platform, easily making a 10% profit. However, this system has now been banned, but they are certainly aware of this phenomenon.
For example, recently when martial law was declared, Bitcoin plummeted by 40% within 10 minutes on Upbit and Bithumb. I am sure many people tried to buy the dip and then sell on Binance, or wait for it to rebound. But based on my conversations with some people, the arbitrage strategy was very difficult to execute at that time because Upbit and Bitdump were both frozen, preventing deposits and withdrawals.
I even heard that due to the current unstable situation of the Korean government, some people would place advance orders that would automatically execute once the market experienced another extreme drop, allowing them to acquire chips at very low prices.

On December 3, affected by the declaration of martial law, BTC experienced a severe 40% undershoot on Korean exchanges such as Upbit and Bithumb; image source from the internet
BlockBeats: The cryptocurrency tax policy in Korea seems to have been constantly delayed. Do people care about this?
Andy: They care a lot about this. Every time it reaches a critical point, the running politicians always include the postponement of taxation or in-depth study of related policies as part of their campaign agenda. Korea has already experienced three tax delays here, each time being a two-year postponement, and now it's another two years. However, from what I know, the new president isn't as optimistic about cryptocurrency, which has made some people worried. Nevertheless, the issue of cryptocurrency taxation is a topic of great concern, and everyone is paying close attention to it.
You may also like

ZachXBT: Humanity private key leak and abnormal surge in H token should be viewed separately
On June 9, according to related disclosures, on-chain investigator ZachXBT posted an update on Humanity’s roughly $31 million security incident, saying that after further analyzing fund flows, he currently tends to believe the project team was not involved in an “inside job” or a self-staged attack. According to him, the official explanation about the private key leak was broadly accurate, but before the token unlock, the price of H had been artificially pushed higher, and the hacker later took advantage of that market environment; therefore, the private key leak and the earlier abnormal price pumping should be regarded as two separate and independent events. This reframing has shifted the market’s understanding of the nature of the incident. Earlier discussion around Humanity had focused on whether the team directly participated in the attack or used the security incident to cover up internal operations. ZachXBT’s latest remarks shift the focus from “whether it was self-theft” to “whether there were pre-unlock market structure issues.” He also questioned whether the team may have.

Morning Report | OpenAI has submitted an S-1 registration statement draft to the U.S. SEC; Morpho completes $175 million financing

Morning Report | BitMine increased its holdings by 126,971 ETH last week; trader Eugene announced his exit from the crypto market

Wang Chuan: How can one not feel anxious after the neighbor Old Wang made thirty times profit by investing in storage stocks? (Seven) - A quarter-century cycle

Cryptocurrency CEXs are flocking to sell US stocks, and traditional brokerages are facing an "uninvited guest."

$75 billion in foreign capital has fled, and South Korean retail investors have absorbed it all using leverage

Japan’s Three Megabanks Plan Joint Stablecoin Issuance in Fiscal 2026
MUFG, SMBC, and Mizuho reportedly plan to jointly issue fiat-pegged stablecoins in fiscal 2026, signaling Japan’s growing push into bank-led digital payment infrastructure.

Humanity Discloses H Token Dual-Chain Attack Details, With Losses on Ethereum and BSC Exceeding $36 Million
Humanity said the H token attack across Ethereum and BSC caused more than $36 million in losses after leaked ProxyAdmin keys enabled malicious contract upgrades and token minting.

White House Discusses CLARITY Act With Law Enforcement Ahead of Senate Vote
The White House discussed the CLARITY Act with law enforcement ahead of a Senate vote, focusing on illicit finance risks and developer protections.

Bitcoin Trading Guide 2026: Strategies for Experienced Traders

What Is XAUT and PAXG? Why Tokenized Gold Is Booming in 2026

Will the SpaceX IPO Hurt Bitcoin? Here's What Traders Are Watching

Foreign selling in the South Korean stock market accelerates, with cumulative net sales reportedly reaching $75 billion this year
On June 9, The Kobeissi Letter, citing Goldman Sachs data, reported that global investors are selling South Korean stocks at an unusually rapid pace. In the latest trading session, foreign investors sold about $801 million worth of Kospi constituent stocks again; total foreign outflows last week reached about $10 billion, and the market has been in net foreign selling on nearly every trading day over the past month. According to the data cited in the report, foreign investors have sold about $75 billion worth of South Korean stocks so far this year. Meanwhile, South Korean retail and institutional investors together recorded roughly $69 billion in net buying over the same period, suggesting that the market’s main buying support has come from domestic capital rather than returning overseas funds. The information currently disclosed still mainly comes from The Kobeissi Letter’s retelling and Goldman Sachs data summaries, while public details on the statistical period and the specific definition of “selling” remain relatively limited.

Fortune Warns of Strategy’s Financing Structure Risks as Bitcoin Premium Narrows
Fortune warned that Strategy’s Bitcoin treasury model faces growing financing risks as MSTR’s net asset premium narrows and preferred stock dividend pressure increases.

Ferrari Challenge Le Mans: Carl Moon to Dominate in WEEX Livery

Sahara AI Responds to SAHARA’s Sharp Drop: No Contract or Product Security Issues Found, Internal Investigation Underway
Sahara AI responded to SAHARA’s 60% price drop, saying no token contract or product security issues have been found and an internal investigation is underway.

WEEX Deposit/Withdrawal Dynamic Island: Your Asset Status, Always in Sight

Scaling Crypto Derivatives: The Digital Asset Infrastructure Behind High-Volume Trading
In the fast-moving digital asset ecosystem, derivatives platforms face an extreme architectural test. High-leverage futures markets demand more than just standard security—they require absolute operational precision, zero-latency matching engines, and ironclad structural scalability, all while navigating intense market volatility.
As global platforms scale to meet these demands, the industry is shifting away from rigid, monolithic setups toward a more agile, "decoupled" infrastructure philosophy.
The Blueprint for High-Volume Copy TradingFor elite global exchanges like WEEX (founded in 2018), this architectural choice becomes critical when scaling high-volume retail features like social copy trading. When thousands of users automatically mirror the real-time strategies of elite traders simultaneously, it triggers sudden, monumental spikes in concurrent transactional volume.
To prevent execution latency or settlement bottlenecks during these peak volatility events, a platform's primary engine must remain entirely dedicated to risk management, copy-trade synchronization, and order matching.
The Architectural Rule: New-generation platforms must separate front-end user execution engines from heavy backend infrastructural overhead to eliminate operational friction.
By separating these layers, platforms can maintain complete sovereignty over their trading environments and user experiences while strategically aligning with institutional-grade infrastructure ecosystems. This strategic framework allows modern exchanges to leverage advanced Digital Asset Custody infrastructure such as Cobo’s behind the scenes, ensuring that backend wallet management scales elastically alongside trading spikes.
Capitalizing on Market Momentum and 400× LeverageIn a derivatives arena where platforms offer up to 400× leverage on perpetual contracts, capital efficiency and market agility are core business metrics. To capture market momentum, an exchange needs the ability to rapidly expand its asset offerings, supporting everything from legacy crypto assets to sudden, trending altcoins across a massive library of trading pairs.
Adopting a flexible, scalable Wallet-as-a-Service (WaaS) solution such as Cobo’s could completely rewrite the development timeline for high-growth exchanges. Instead of spending months of engineering capital building out custom backend wallet architectures for every new blockchain network, platforms can deploy localized infrastructure in days.
This agility allows platforms to instantly scale their listings to over a thousand trading pairs without compromising security or delaying time-to-market. It mirrors the exact operational advantages seen during high-velocity market events, similar to how advanced wallet infrastructure empowers platforms during sudden asset surges; allowing exchanges to pass that speed and liquidity directly to their global user base.
A Mature Foundation for GrowthThe synergy between trusted infrastructure ecosystems and global trading platforms represents the natural evolution of a maturing crypto market. As WEEX continues to scale its global spot and derivatives offerings for over 6 million users, adopting robust backend paradigms proves that platforms no longer have to compromise between cutting-edge trading velocity and uncompromised structural security.
ZachXBT: Humanity private key leak and abnormal surge in H token should be viewed separately
On June 9, according to related disclosures, on-chain investigator ZachXBT posted an update on Humanity’s roughly $31 million security incident, saying that after further analyzing fund flows, he currently tends to believe the project team was not involved in an “inside job” or a self-staged attack. According to him, the official explanation about the private key leak was broadly accurate, but before the token unlock, the price of H had been artificially pushed higher, and the hacker later took advantage of that market environment; therefore, the private key leak and the earlier abnormal price pumping should be regarded as two separate and independent events. This reframing has shifted the market’s understanding of the nature of the incident. Earlier discussion around Humanity had focused on whether the team directly participated in the attack or used the security incident to cover up internal operations. ZachXBT’s latest remarks shift the focus from “whether it was self-theft” to “whether there were pre-unlock market structure issues.” He also questioned whether the team may have.


